home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- MINIMUF4.DOC, Version 4.1
-
- July 26, 1986, by R. Dean Straw, N6BV
-
-
-
- History of the Program:
-
- Version 3.5 of MINIMUF.BAS was first found on the CompuServ Ham
- Radio SIG about a year ago, and was customized at that time for
- my use in the San Francisco Bay Area. It is my understanding
- that the program was the result of the hard work of many people.
- My modest contribution lies in the area of "fine tuning" it and
- then compiling it for speed.
-
- Version 4.1 presented here corrects some errors in the L/L of
- several geographic areas (New Delhi and Bangkok).
-
- This program will run on an IBM PC or equivalent clone, with no
- less than 256K of RAM, preferably more, so that a print spooler
- can be used to speed things up. Otherwise the limitation on
- speed will be that of the printer.
-
- The MINIMUF 3.5 program was tweaked repeatedly since I got it,
- especially after I recently did an extensive study to compare the
- program's "predictions" to actual results achieved during con-
- tests in February and October (ARRL DX and CQWW contests.)
-
- It was found that the bare-bones MINIMUF.BAS program tended to
- forecast that the HF bands would open up about an hour earlier
- than they actually did during a contest. The program was cor-
- rected for this bias in a rather crude but effective manner by
- shifting the matrix around by an hour. Then range and bearing
- calculations were added to spice things up, and to give heed to
- the warning when the original MINIMUF was published in September
- 1982 QST that distances greater than about 6000 miles (presumably
- statute miles, but this could be nautical miles) might yield
- inaccurate MUF results.
-
- By the way, the stations used during these contests were first-
- class contest stations, with large and high antenna arrays.
- These stations consistently were able to open and close bands
- ealier than most stations in the general geographic area, and
- thus represent low-angle radiation conditions. The average "city
- lot" station will probably find that the bands open somewhat
- later than and close somewhat sooner than the program will calcu-
- late.
-
- Nevertheless, the MINIMUF4 program will give you a good clue of
- when to be where in a contest situation, particularly during the
- low sunspot cycle years, when higher frequency openings are brief
-
-
- 1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- and ephemeral, if indeed they occur at all.
-
-
- Calling the Program:
-
- First boot up your computer to show the DOS prompt and type
- MINIMUF4, followed by hitting the <Enter> key. The program will
- then prompt you for a name that it will subsequently use as a
- label for the transmitting location. I, for example, type in:
- San Francisco <Enter>. Don't try to enter: San Francisco, CA
- <Enter>. MINIMUF4 isn't expecting a comma, and will give an
- error message.
-
- Next you will be prompted for your location's latitude and longi-
- tude. These should be entered with a comma separating the lati-
- tude and longitude, and you must convert minutes to decimal
- portions of degrees: i.e., for 37 degrees 38 minutes North lati-
- tude, 122 degrees 24 minutes West longitude, you would key in:
- 37.63,122.40 <Enter>, since 38 minutes is 38/60 = .63 degrees,
- and 24 minutes is 24/60 = .40 degrees.
-
- Accuracy down to this level is not really needed: your latitude
- and longitude within a degree will yield results consistent with
- amateur work!
-
- You can then follow the prompts given for the rest of the infor-
- mation the program requires. The Solar Flux numbers are general-
- ly entered as the average of the last three days' worth of data
- (plus today's SF number, making 4 days of data) from the WWV
- transmissions at 18 minutes past the hour.
-
- Comparisons to the charts published in QST each month are in-
- structive. In general, the curves follow pretty well the QST
- predictions, with perhaps an optimistic bias that tends to show a
- somewhat higher MUF than QST does. This is actually useful for
- contest preparation, since it alerts you to the possibility that
- a higher band might be open, and you can plan to be there to try
- things out and perhaps snag a QSO or two you might not have
- gotten otherwise.
-
- Note of course that the actual smoother Sunspot Number for a
- particular contest period can be used, rather than using a pre-
- diction of what the Sunspot Number is expected to be. QST has to
- work under the burden of a two or three month publishing dead-
- line, remember.
-
- I would appreciate any comments you might have about this pro-
- gram. Write:
-
- R. Dean Straw, N6BV
- 5328 Fulton Street
- San Francisco, CA 94121
-
-
-
-
-
- 2
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Street
- San